01
Distributed
Power is made next to the place that consumes it. That avoids grid transportation trouble — line congestion, losses, and the wait to move megawatts across the network.
ENXIA Inc. · United States
Off-grid power for industry and data centers.
ENXIA’s advantage is distributed, 24×7 supply. AISEG plants sit next to the factory or data campus that uses the power — no combustion fuel, and non-stop, unlike solar and wind that follow the weather and still need the grid to move energy.
24×7Non-stop vs intermittent green
> 95%Specified capacity factor / uptime
> 60 yrSpecified service life
At the loadNo grid transportation
The advantage
24×7 power, generated where it is used.
Other green solutions stop when the sun sets or the wind drops, then lean on the grid or on batteries. ENXIA puts compact AISEG generation at the industrial or data-center site — non-stop supply, with no grid transportation in between.
02
24×7
Unlike solar, wind, and other weather-tied green power, AISEG is specified for non-stop supply — twenty-four hours a day. No battery farm to fill the night.
03
Data centers
Campus power for AI and cloud facilities that cannot dim with the weather — sized to the hall, specified for high availability, built as arrays of AISEG modules.
Why AISEG
A generator that does not spin, burn, or emit.
From ENXIA’s September 2026 technology introduction: AISEG is a patented stackable unit. It eliminates physical rotation and produces electromotive force through AI-driven digital power switching. One module is approximately the size of a single solar panel.
- Plug & play — operates on connection with zero loading time
- Non-rotary structure with no mechanical wear
- No combustion fuel; no stack emissions; specified life above 60 years
- Named electrical input: 13 A control current, one unit to thirty-unit arrays
- 24×7 non-stop — not daylight, not wind, not a storage workaround
- Distributed at the load — power where it is used, not hauled across the grid
Cost — as of today
Prototype capital cost per kilowatt is similar to nuclear. We do not sell a future number as today’s price.
Current $/kW is calculated from the experimental prototype, not from a volume manufacturing line. Scale production is expected to reduce per-unit cost. Those reductions remain a future outcome; they are not published here as present-day economics.
TODAY
Prototype basis
Installed cost per kilowatt sits in the same class as a nuclear power plant. That is the honest figure for the hardware as it exists now — experimental units, not factory volume.
LATER
Volume is not today
Manufacturing at scale can bring unit cost down. ENXIA will not treat that path as a current LCOE or a current $/kW. When production cost is measured on a real line, we will publish that number — not a forecast dressed as a spec.
AISEG vs. other energy
Operating attributes of AISEG, with capital cost stated on a prototype basis.
Operating rows follow ENXIA’s September 2026 technology introduction. Heat-engine efficiency is not used for AISEG — it is not a thermal plant. The introduction’s startup-energy multiple is listed separately and is not a thermodynamic efficiency percentage. LCOE for AISEG is marked TBC. Capital cost is prototype $/kW comparable to nuclear, not a volume-production price.
Swipe sideways to compare, or read the stacked cards below.
Energy source
DC excitation (named input)AISEG
- Coal
- Coal
- NGCC
- Natural gas
- Nuclear
- Uranium
- Wind
- Wind
- Solar
- Sunlight
Energy stability
+++AISEG
- Coal
- ++
- NGCC
- ++
- Nuclear
- ++
- Wind
- +
- Solar
- ++
Plant footprint
ModularAISEG
- Coal
- Large
- NGCC
- Large
- Nuclear
- Large
- Wind
- Med–large
- Solar
- Modular
Life
Semi-permanentAISEG
- Coal
- 40 yr
- NGCC
- 30 yr
- Nuclear
- 60 yr
- Wind
- 20 yr
- Solar
- 25 yr
Heat-engine efficiency
Not a heat engineAISEG
- Coal
- 40%
- NGCC
- 55%
- Nuclear
- 33%
- Wind
- 35%
- Solar
- 22%
Startup-energy spec
> 5× (introduction)AISEG
- Coal
- —
- NGCC
- —
- Nuclear
- —
- Wind
- —
- Solar
- —
LCOE (US$/MWh)
Comparably lower (TBC)AISEG
- Coal
- $68–$156
- NGCC
- $39–$101
- Nuclear
- $141–$221
- Wind
- $74–$139
- Solar
- $24–$96
Capital cost ($/kW)
Comparable to nuclear (prototype)AISEG
- Coal
- —
- NGCC
- —
- Nuclear
- Nuclear-class
- Wind
- —
- Solar
- —
Uptime
> 95%AISEG
- Coal
- 85%
- NGCC
- 90%
- Nuclear
- > 90%
- Wind
- 95%
- Solar
- 95%
24×7 supply
Yes — non-stopAISEG
- Coal
- Yes
- NGCC
- Yes
- Nuclear
- Yes
- Wind
- No — intermittent
- Solar
- No — intermittent
Dispatch
Baseload / highly flexibleAISEG
- Coal
- Baseload / inflexible
- NGCC
- Baseload / flexible
- Nuclear
- Baseload / inflexible
- Wind
- Non-baseload
- Solar
- Non-baseload
Combustion / stack
NoneAISEG
- Coal
- Severe
- NGCC
- Moderate
- Nuclear
- None
- Wind
- None
- Solar
- None
Env. impact
Minor or none (noise/heat TBC)AISEG
- Coal
- Moderate
- NGCC
- Minor
- Nuclear
- Waste heat & waste
- Wind
- Noise (zero waste)
- Solar
- None
This comparison is not an energy-balance paper. AISEG is described as an electromagnetic generator with a named DC excitation / control input. This site does not claim perpetual motion or over-unity output. Independent laboratory packs (KEPCO measurement support, KOLAS reports) are cited in the introduction and are available from ENXIA on request — they are not posted here as downloadable files. Prototype $/kW remains comparable to nuclear. Volume-manufacturing reductions are expected; they are not shown as current figures.
Industry
Data centers and industrial loads that cannot wait on the grid.
Talk to ENXIA about an off-grid campus, a manufacturing site, or a data-center hall that needs dedicated 24×7 AISEG supply.